Total Pageviews

Friday, October 23, 2015

The Art of Racing in the Rain Book Review (FINAL)



The Art of Racing in the Rain Book Review
            The Art of Racing in the Rain was written by Garth Stein. Enzo, the main character that is a dog, narrates his life as it happens. From being born on a farm and remembering when he was adopted by Denny as a pet to helping Denny with Eve when she ends up getting sick. Maxwell and Trish, known as the Twins to Enzo, are Eve’s parents. After Eve gets sick, the Twins decide to have Zoë, Eve and Denny’s child, stay at their house with them since Eve is also staying there as she recuperates. This at first seems like a very warm and loving gesture, but as the story goes on the true intentions of the Twins begin to come to light. Was it a loving gesture? Or was it something entirely different? What makes this book even more interesting the besides the fact that it is told from a dog’s point of view is that, the dog has human qualities. It can think just like a human so the story has the quality of language similarly to that of a person. From riding along in an actual racecar to just sitting in next to Denny watching old racing tapes, Enzo’s life as a dog is nothing short of a roller-coaster ride as he goes from attacking a zebra, to riding in an actual racecar, and then getting hit by an actual car. Stein’s work will have the reader crying and laughing at the same time.
            Setting was very interesting in this book. It really helped to create suspense where it was needed in the book as well as make the book more enjoyable to read. Stein’s vivid description of the courthouse really shows the power of setting. Even though most of that certain part of the book was fabricated in Enzo’s head, it still shows the complexity of the setting. As narrated by Enzo, “The new Seattle courthouse: glass walls and metal beams” (294). From this description of the courthouse, the reader understands that there are many important decisions that happen in that building as well as it being a big part in Denny’s life. It is where Denny goes along with Mr. Lawrence, to help argue for Denny’s case in getting custody of Zoë back. While this description of the courtroom might be a little brief, the reader can visualize what the courtroom looks like. This is really just one example in the book where Stein’s writing really tends to encapsulate the reader with the description of various places in the book. It is with these very intricate details about various settings in The Art of Racing in the Rain that the reader is able to feel like they are actually in the book especially regarding places like the old house that Denny used to live in, as well as inside the racecar when Enzo is riding along with Denny. This shows how important setting is in general, especially in this book.
            Another element to The Art of Racing in the Rain that really helped to make the story interesting to read and follow were the characters and how the characters were really quite complex throughout the story. There are many different types of characters throughout the book. There is Denny who is a car mechanic and a race car driver. There is Eve who is Denny’s wife and has an art degree. Then at the same time, there is also the Twins who have a lot of money and want to make sure that Zoë does not necessarily follow down the path that Denny and Eve had gone down. This “path” could pretty much be referred to, by them as the “bad” path, since it was not in line with what the Twins wanted for Eve or Zoë. The characters that have been listed are the main characters; however, there are some minor characters that really do play a big role in the story. Mike and Tony are there for Denny in his time of need. Denny goes to them for support and insight and they in return watch Enzo when Denny is unable to. They are also there to fill in the necessarily silence with laughter which happens quite a lot. A perfect example of this is when Enzo tells Denny not to sign the release of custody papers and instead grabs them and jumps out the window. This is followed my Mike saying: “If we had a videotape of that, we could win ten thousand dollars on America’s Funniest Home Videos” (266.) There is Mike adding laughter into a situation that is a little too tense and gets Denny to lighten up considerably. Stein does a tremendous job of giving minor characters a really big part in this book. Normally, these characters would be left out and not really considered a big role in the book, Stein does the opposite. If it was not for the minor characters in the novel, such as Mike and Tony, a few major things would not have happened. The novel would not have been as funny and Denny would never have been at their house for support, he would have instead signed the custody papers and the story would be over. This is how important the minor characters are as well as just the variety of characters in The Art of Racing in the Rain and just how important of roles they fill.
            The writing style of Stein is something that really helps make the overall book flow really well. From the insight into the mind of Enzo, to just the overall story, the writing style of Stein is impeccable. The part of The Art of Racing in the Rain that really shows off his true writing style is when, Enzo is talking about what happened in court as well as the part where Enzo is “testifying” on Denny’s innocence with a device, similar to Stephen Hawking’s device, that makes Enzo’s voice audible to everybody present. As Mr. Lawrence explains to the judge, “We’ve borrowed a special voice synthesizer that was developed for Stephen Hawking… [It] reads the electrical pulses of the inner brain—” (300). This is an interesting concept and it is just one of the examples throughout the book that really exhibits Stein’s unique writing style. To come up with such a genius idea of having Enzo somehow talk to the people in the audience since Enzo was present during the alleged crime, is pure literary genius. Even though this interaction with Enzo in front of the judge did not actually happen since it was a dream; Stein still wrote about it and added some really interesting literary elements for something that in the broad range of the novel, really did not matter since it did not happen. This just shows how dedicated Stein was to this novel as well as how unique and interesting his writing style is as well. This is why in The Art of Racing in the Rain, Stein’s writing style does a very good job of portraying what the various characters are thinking and feeling.
            I would recommend this novel. All in all this was a decent novel. I normally do not necessarily like novels about animals because they can be all “mushy” and the animal normally doesn’t do anything that I would consider “impressive” in the novel. The Art of Racing in the Rain was different in a few ways. First, Enzo (the dog) was able to actually do many different things that were “impressive” such as helping Denny with his problems in court and simply just being there for Denny. Also, it wasn’t exactly “mushy.” Sure, there were times throughout the novel where it could have been, but Stein did a really good job of keeping the novel moving so that it did not become stagnate. In that aspect, I did enjoy the novel. It is for people that like to read stories about animals and for people that are open to new ideas about life as there are some philosophical elements to the novel as well. (3 stars out of 5.)

Thursday, October 22, 2015

This I Believe - You Do Not Need to Be Perfect


Record and upload audio >>

This I Believe -- That You Do Not Need to Perfect

Straight A's. 4.0 + GPA. A full-ride to college on a scholarship. A 36 on the ACT. A 2400 on the SAT (including writing). I could go on but I won't. What do these all have in common?

These are perfect scores. People are judged over these scores. People spend thousands of dollars to get the high ACT and SAT scores and the high GPA. What does that mean?

That means that people did the best that they could possibly do. They are in the 99th percentile they are the National Merit Scholars, they are the ones who go to an Ivy League school and end up becoming the next CEOs of major corporations like Google, Apple, and Microsoft, heck, they could even end up as the next President of the United States. The point is, is that they were able to use their grades as a huge and potentially lucrative stepping stone for getting into those companies.  

What happens if I am not in the 99th percentile? What happens if I did not get the highest score on the ACT or SAT or do not have 4.0 GPA? Well what society wants you to think about yourself is that you my friend are STUPID. Yep, you heard that right, you are stupid. How does that make you feel? Sad? Hurt? Rejected? A failure? Well you should, since society wants you to feel that way.

This I Believe—you do not need to be perfect. It is nice to do well so that people recognize you as being a National Merit Scholar or someone who got a perfect score on the ACT or SAT. Congrats to them. But in the long-term, these scores will not necessarily matter. Sure, in getting into colleges and into graduate programs, these scores will matter but they will not matter forever.

 This I Believe—you do not need to be perfect. I used to be the individual that had the 4.0 GPA, the high scores on the standardized tests the one that people would always whisper behind my back “Look at him, he’s so smart!” I felt that I was on top of the world because people were realizing how well I was doing in school and I lived for that realization, that attention. This was even going on for freshmen year at U of D.

This I Believe—you do not need to be perfect. This sense of being on the top of the class continued all the way up to sophomore year when I took Chinese II. Now Chinese in general wasn’t that hard as a class and to this day I do not necessarily understand why I ended up doing so poorly but all I know was that when I was mid-way through Sophomore year, I vividly remember seeing a ‘D’ for my current grade in Chinese II. I was no longer perfect, I was no longer at the top of the grade, I was now STUPID. I ended up pulling the grade up and am now doing great in school but I learned an important lesson. It is impossible to be perfect, eventually you will fail, and I just happened to fail at that particular time of that particular year. I was able to pick myself up and I am now doing very well.

This I Believe—you do not need to be perfect. There will be many different times in your life where you will have the opportunity to do well, something will hamper you or mess you up, and you will end up failing. I ask of you one thing, do not give up. Giving up is the absolute WORST thing to do. Keep trying because eventually you will succeed. I leave you with this quote from George R. R. Martin in A Dance with Dragons, I understand that the quote pertains to reading, but it can also be applied to life in general, “A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies. The man who never reads lives only one.” Think of each individual book as an opportunity, through trying again you will be able to be more successful and become better at what you are doing.

  This I Believe.


Friday, October 16, 2015

Fantasy Post

I like to read fantasy but as I earlier stated in the beginning blog post for this class, I find that reading fantasy is not necessarily "beneficial" since I am learning something "substantial." Because of this it is quite rare that I actually read fantasy novels but I really do enjoy them. I used to read a lot of them when I was such as The Secrets of Droon by Tony Abbott and the Harry Potter series by J. K. Rowling.

The fantasy location from a novel that is my favorite is Diagon Alley in the Harry Potter series. It is really interesting and cool and I would really enjoy being there since it is the marketplace of all wizardly. I would go there because it is one of a kind and it would be cool to experience it.

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Benefits of Internet Censorship Project Infographic


I picked this topic because I am interested in the internet, especially internet surveillance. I actually stand for the other side of the argument that internet censorship is bad. Pierce got this side of the argument. the reason that I chose this side was to find out if there were really any "benefits" to internet censorship. As you can see there are a few, but they are not necessarily the best benefits. I personally do not believe in this side.

For this topic in particular it was REALLY hard. Whenever you searched anything about internet censorship there would be tons of "hits" related to how bad it was and what data the NSA is collecting about you from their various internet censorship programs. In regards to staying focused on this particular topic, it was not since there was a lot more out there for the other side of the argument then there was for my side of the argument. It was a little hard to remain bias to my side since I generally lean toward the other side anyway.

I looks the way it does because internet censorship affects pretty much everyone in the world, besides a few countries. The graphics were meant to be little "tid-bits" that went around what I was able to grasp from learning about this topic and they are easy to remember and read. I made the choices because they were the best way to portray the information relating to the topic.

I feel that it is effective in convincing my audience about the topic but at the same time I feel that it could've been a little bit better if I had taken the other side of the argument or simply if there was more information out there about the benefit of internet censorship not just the negatives of it.